Looking at SiteSetu (https://sitesetu.app): what price would make it a no-brainer for you, and at what price would you stop considering it? What would you expect to get for that money? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Page reviewed

SiteSetu: BOQ from Drawings & Construction Management App

https://sitesetu.app/ (opens in a new tab)
Saved screenshot of SiteSetu: BOQ from Drawings & Construction Management App
Screenshot saved with this question. The live page may have changed.Open full image ↗

10 fictional AI personas. Exploratory perspectives, not a survey of real customers. Methodology & limitations

Simulated interest

58/100

AI synthesis, not measured demand

Suggested price range

$50–300

Median $100 · simulated willingness to pay

Response sentiment

Positive 10%Neutral 90%Negative 0%
The takeaway

What this panel suggests

The main signal here is not resistance to price so much as confusion about the pricing model. Respondents repeatedly reacted to the gap between the page’s per-project BOQ framing and the product context’s subscription wording, so the first pricing task is to make that relationship unmistakable. Once the model is clear, the value they expect is also clear: accurate BOQs, engineer verification, traceable measurement sheets, and exportable Excel/PDF output. For a subscription framing, the reported willingness-to-pay cluster centers around $100/month, with a lower anchor near $50 and a higher ceiling near $300 for more comprehensive access. For a project-based motion, the published starting price feels acceptable for simple houses, especially with the first-project offer, but buyers want scope clarity and, for heavier users, volume discounts. Overall, the feedback suggests moderate interest and a pricing conversation shaped more by trust, auditability, and fit-for-use than by raw sticker shock.

A hypothesis to test

Pricing & positioning

Treat pricing as a clarification problem before an optimization problem. The responses suggest buyers can accept either a per-project BOQ fee or a monthly SaaS fee, but they want the model made explicit. A subscription framing appears viable around the reported median willingness to pay, while project-based buyers seem comfortable with the stated entry price for simple jobs.

Clarify whether the offer is a one-time BOQ service, a recurring construction app subscription, or a hybrid.If monthly SaaS is the intended model, keep the core promise centered on engineer-verified BOQs, measurement sheets, Excel/PDF export, and fast turnaround.If per-project pricing remains the main motion, spell out scope, deliverables, and any volume or repeat-customer discounts.The strongest value signals come from accuracy, auditability, and time saved, not from raw AI positioning.

Recurring themes

Pricing model confusion: per-project vs subscription
“The pricing here is a bit unclear for me. It states 'From ₹2,500 per project' which sounds like a one-off fee for a specific job. However, the product context mentions a 'USD per month subscription'”Read Jeanette Bins’s response →
Value tied to accuracy, engineer verification, and traceability
“If the service consistently provides accurate, engineer-verified BOQs quickly, I could see myself paying up to $150 per month”Read Ashok Gupta’s response →
Small-project entry price feels accessible
“For a simple house, starting at ₹2,500 is acceptable, especially with the 50% off first project offer.”Read Ashok Gupta’s response →

Objections to investigate

  • Unclear pricing structure
  • High cost for complex or high-volume work
  • Need for volume discounts in a project-based model

Use these findings to plan customer interviews or experiments. How to interpret AI research

What the panel said

Click a name to open that persona’s full profile.

Ashok Guptaneutral

The pricing model is per project, which is what I'm used to. For a simple house, starting at ₹2,500 is acceptable, especially with the 50% off first project offer. However, the pricing for larger projects like high-rises goes up significantly, and I'd need to see a detailed breakdown for those. If the service consistently provides accurate, engineer-verified BOQs quickly, I could see myself paying up to $150 per month for a steady flow of smaller projects or as a supplement to my own work. Anything above $300 per month would be difficult to justify given my current workload and income.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Jeanette Binsneutral

The pricing here is a bit unclear for me. It states 'From ₹2,500 per project' which sounds like a one-off fee for a specific job. However, the product context mentions a 'USD per month subscription' and the page itself talks about a 'construction management app' which usually implies a recurring cost. I’d need a clearer understanding of whether this is a per-project service or a monthly subscription for using the software. If it’s a per-project service like the examples suggest, then a no-brainer price for a typical office refurbishment BOQ would be around £150-£200, and I'd stop considering it if it went much over £300. If it's a monthly subscription for ongoing access to the software, I'd need to see significant time savings across multiple projects to justify more than $50-75 per month.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Bert Kubneutral

The pricing here is a bit unclear for me. It's listed as 'from ₹2,500 per project,' which sounds like a per-project fee. However, the product blurb mentions a 'USD per month subscription.' I typically handle multiple tenant improvement and light industrial jobs each month, so a subscription model would make more sense for my workflow. If it's a per-project fee, I'd need to see a volume discount structure. For a subscription, I'd expect it to cover a certain number of projects or drawing sets per month, with engineer verification, and perhaps some level of integration with my current Excel process. A 'no-brainer' price for me, assuming a monthly subscription for unlimited or a high volume of projects, would be around $150-$200 per month. Anything over $300 a month for this service would likely make me stop considering it.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Carmen Schererneutral

The pricing structure is per project, which is difficult for my ongoing needs as a cost engineer. While ₹2,500 per project is appealing for a simple house, it's unclear how that scales to complex façade and envelope packages I work with. For a 'no-brainer' price, I'd need a monthly subscription that offers a certain number of takeoffs or unlimited usage for a fixed cost, perhaps around $200-$300 per month, offering comprehensive takeoff capabilities from PDFs and DWGs, engineer verification, and detailed measurement sheets. Anything above $500 per month would make me reconsider, especially if the per-project pricing remains the only option.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Gudakesha Patelpositive

This SiteSetu service sounds promising, especially the part about converting PDF drawings to BOQs with engineer verification and measurement sheets. My biggest problem is the manual conversion, which takes so much time and is prone to errors. If a simple house BOQ costs ₹2,500, that seems reasonable, especially with the 50% discount on the first project. For me to consider it a no-brainer, I'd expect this to cover small villa projects without much hassle. If it gets too complicated or the price for a standard villa project goes beyond ₹5,000, I might reconsider. I'd be willing to pay up to $75 per month if it were a subscription service that I could use for multiple projects throughout the year, but the current pricing seems to be per project, which is a bit different. For a per-project basis, a maximum of $50 (around ₹4,000) would be my limit for a standard residential project.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Mikki Kuypersneutral

This service pricing is a bit confusing for me. The "from ₹2,500 per project" and then "first project 50% off (up to ₹5,000), minimum ₹2,500" is difficult to parse without knowing the typical project size for my work. Given that I spend hours manually measuring, a price that feels like a no-brainer would be around $50-$75 USD per project for a standard residential or small commercial building, assuming the accuracy is verifiable. I'd expect a detailed, engineer-verified BOQ with clear measurement sheets that I can cross-reference. Anything above $150 USD per project would start to make me question the value compared to my own time, especially if it's not for a very complex project.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Joshua Rempel-Baumbachneutral

Right then, looking at this SiteSetu... the price they're quoting is in Rupees, and I'm not about to do mental gymnastics converting that to pounds. If it were a subscription model, say, something that takes the grunt work out of pricing my tenders, I'd be looking at maybe $75 to $100 a month, tops. For that, I'd expect it to take my PDF drawings and spit out a proper Bill of Quantities, all measured up accurately, so I can price it straight off. Anything more than $150 a month, and I'd be thinking it's not worth the hassle.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Phyllis Pourosneutral

This SiteSetu service is interesting, but it's priced per project, which isn't ideal for my freelance model where I need consistent, predictable costs for my clients and my own budgeting. I'm accustomed to using PlanSwift and exporting to Excel, so I'd need this to be significantly faster and more accurate than my current process to justify switching or adding it. If it could automate the entire takeoff and BOQ generation from PDF/DWG, I'd consider a monthly subscription. A no-brainer price would be around $100 per month for unlimited projects. Anything over $250 per month would be too much for me to justify.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Baptiste Denisneutral

The pricing structure is a bit unclear. It states "from ₹2,500 per project," but then mentions "final quote after we see your drawings." I would need to understand what constitutes a "project" and the typical scope for that price. If it's a per-item or per-drawing fee, that would be more straightforward. For a small interior fit-out project, I might consider it if it were around $50-75 per project, assuming it's accurate and saves significant time. Anything above $100 per project would make me reconsider, especially without knowing the exact deliverables. I am not looking for a monthly subscription service for this type of task; it's project-based.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Garud Guptaneutral

The pricing structure is confusing. It says 'from ₹2,500 per project,' but then mentions 'USD per month subscription' in the blurb. If it's per project, the first project discount is good, making it around ₹1,250. That would be very attractive for a small house. However, a monthly subscription would be different. If I had to pay monthly, I wouldn't consider anything above $50, but I'd expect a lot of projects to be covered for that price. Ideally, I would pay around $20 per month for the AI to process my drawings. Right now, I am doing it all manually, and it takes a lot of time. I would need to see a clear pricing model to decide.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Keep exploring.

Find your next question or see which topics divide AI panels.

Keep exploring

What would you ask next?

Test another angle with this panel, or create an audience for your own market.