What do you use today instead of RogerRoger (https://www.rogerroger.io) (a competitor, a spreadsheet, doing it by hand)? Compared with that, what would make RogerRoger better or worse for you, and what would keep you on your current option? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Ricky Langoshneutral

Right now, we're juggling Gmail, LinkedIn DMs, and WhatsApp using a shared spreadsheet for assignments and a basic CRM for notes. It's manual and frankly, a headache. RogerRoger's unified inbox sounds like it could really streamline things, especially the idea of managing all our communications in one place without constant tab-switching. The Kanban board for deals and tasks is appealing for organization. What I'm not seeing clearly is how well it integrates with our existing CRM or if it offers robust reporting for client ROI. If it can genuinely cut down on our admin time and improve response rates, that's huge. I'd be willing to pay up to $150 per month for a solution that effectively solves these workflow bottlenecks.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Kendra Shieldsneutral

Currently, we manage shared inboxes in Front, and our HubSpot data syncs are separate. This setup forces a lot of manual context switching, which is exactly what I'm trying to eliminate. RogerRoger's promise of a unified inbox for LinkedIn, email, and WhatsApp is appealing. The Kanban board feature sounds useful for visualising our pipeline. What I need to understand is how seamlessly it integrates with HubSpot, or if it replaces that functionality, and what the actual workflow looks like when handling high volumes. I'd be willing to consider a price of around $50 per month per user, but that would require a thorough trial to prove its value.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Liam van der Lindenpositive

Right now, we use a combination of shared Gmail labels for emails, Trello for project management, and then manually copy-paste between LinkedIn and WhatsApp for client outreach. It's functional, but frankly, a bit of a mess. The biggest draw for RogerRoger would be consolidating all these conversations into one place, especially LinkedIn and WhatsApp. That ability to see everything without switching tabs sounds like a dream. What would make it worse? If it's complicated to set up or if the integrations aren't seamless. The manual work is tedious, but at least I know it. What would keep me on my current system is if RogerRoger doesn't truly simplify things or adds unexpected costs. I'd be willing to pay up to $60 per month, billed monthly.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Vivian Kettenisneutral

Currently, we manage incoming prospect messages using a combination of our shared email inbox and direct LinkedIn messages, with some manual routing and occasional WhatsApp follow-ups for European leads. It's functional but requires constant vigilance to ensure no messages slip through the cracks, which is a significant operational overhead. RogerRoger's unified inbox for email, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp is appealing because it promises to consolidate these channels, reducing manual effort and potential errors. The Kanban board for deals and tasks is also interesting for visualizing our pipeline more effectively than our current spreadsheet-based approach. What concerns me is how well it integrates with our existing CRM and the actual effort required to set up and maintain the routing logic. The ability to assign conversations and collaborate on messages is a clear improvement over our current ad-hoc system. I would consider paying around $40 per month for a tool that reliably streamlines our communication and improves data hygiene.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Cesar Boehmneutral

Currently, I manage all my leads and follow-ups using my personal Gmail inbox and a Google Sheet. It's a very manual process, which I recognize is a limitation as the business grows. The idea of unifying my email and LinkedIn messages in one place, as RogerRoger suggests, is appealing. It could potentially save time by reducing tab switching and centralizing communication. The Kanban board feature also seems like a more visual way to track deals than my current spreadsheet. However, I'm concerned about the learning curve and integration with my existing workflow. What would keep me on my current system is if RogerRoger doesn't truly streamline things or if it adds complexity I don't have the bandwidth to manage right now. I'd be willing to pay around $30 per month for a tool like this, given my current income and the fact that it's a bootstrapped business.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Traci Roweneutral

Currently, we rely on a combination of shared documents, which are becoming quite cumbersome, and then manually tracking everything. For us, RogerRoger's promise of a unified inbox for email and LinkedIn is particularly appealing, as those are our primary communication channels. The drag-and-drop Kanban board for deals and tasks also sounds like a significant improvement over our current manual tracking. The biggest hurdle to adopting something like this would be the learning curve for the team and ensuring it truly streamlines our process rather than adding another layer of complexity. We'd also need to see how it handles the long, drawn-out nature of postgraduate applications. I wouldn't be willing to pay anything at this point, as we're trying to manage costs and our current system, while flawed, is 'free'.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Bartolomeo Franceseneutral

Today, my team and I manage our client communications through a shared inbox with very specific labels, and we track deals in a simple spreadsheet. We also keep separate notes. RogerRoger's promise of a unified inbox for email, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp is appealing because it addresses the constant issue of information silos and the time we spend manually consolidating everything. The drag-and-drop Kanban board feature for deal tracking sounds more organized than our current spreadsheet. However, I'm concerned about the complexity of migrating our existing data and the learning curve for my team. We've had success with our current, albeit manual, system, and I'd need to see a clear, tangible benefit to justify switching. The pricing isn't clear from what I see, so it's hard to say what we'd pay per month.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Alyssa Armstrongneutral

Currently, we're managing leads through a combination of Gmail, Notion, and our CRM. It's functional, but it requires a lot of manual effort to keep everything connected and ensure no opportunities fall through the cracks. RogerRoger's promise of a unified inbox for email, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp is appealing because it directly addresses that fragmentation. The idea of a Kanban board for deals and tasks within the platform also sounds like a way to streamline our pipeline management. What I'm not entirely clear on is how well it integrates with our existing CRM – that's a critical point for us. If it truly simplifies our current workflow and reduces the time spent on manual data entry without adding complexity, it could be a significant improvement. However, adding another tool is always a careful decision. Given our current setup and my focus on efficiency, I'd be willing to pay up to $50 per month.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Devak Menonneutral

Right now, we're juggling emails, LinkedIn messages, and a ton of WhatsApp chats, all managed through a shared inbox and spreadsheets. It's honestly chaotic. RogerRoger seems like it could seriously streamline things by bringing all those communications into one place. That's the biggest plus. What I'm not clear on is how well it integrates with our current client management or if it truly eliminates the need for spreadsheets for tracking specific candidate pipelines. If it can genuinely centralize everything and provide better team oversight without adding complexity, that would be a huge win. I'd be willing to pay around $50 per month, possibly up to $75 if it proves to be as seamless as it looks for our team.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Sixtine Andrepositive

At the moment, we're managing our prospect and client communications across various platforms, primarily email and LinkedIn, with some WhatsApp for international accounts. We also use a spreadsheet to keep track of deals, which can be quite manual. RogerRoger's unified inbox sounds appealing because it would consolidate everything, potentially saving us significant time switching between tabs. The Kanban board feature for managing the sales pipeline is also interesting; our current system is quite basic. It would be better if it seamlessly integrated with our existing CRM and offered robust collaboration features for my two sales colleagues and me. I'm not sure what would make it worse than our current method, as it's already quite fragmented. I would be willing to pay up to $40 per month.

Simulated interest: 75/100