What do you use today instead of Prompt Engine (https://promptengine.cc/) (a competitor, a spreadsheet, doing it by hand)? Compared with that, what would make Prompt Engine better or worse for you, and what would keep you on your current option? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).
10 fictional AI personas. Exploratory perspectives, not a survey of real customers. Methodology & limitations
Simulated interest
AI synthesis, not measured demand
Suggested price range
Median $20 · simulated willingness to pay
Response sentiment
What this panel suggests
Most respondents said they currently rely on fragmented, manual workflows rather than a dedicated prompt platform: Google Docs, Notion, spreadsheets, past ChatGPT threads, and ad hoc prompt writing. Compared with those methods, Prompt Engine is attractive mainly because it promises speed, repeatability, and better organization. The strongest appeal is reducing prompt creation from a slow, manual task into something faster and more structured, especially for users juggling many prompts or models. The biggest hesitation is not the idea of prompt assistance itself, but whether Prompt Engine fits smoothly into existing workflows. Respondents worried it could become another silo, add friction, or require extra training and team buy-in. There is also caution about automated output quality: users like the idea of optimization, but some are unsure whether it can match human refinement and nuance. On pricing, the observed willingness to pay clusters close to the current $19/month level, with some stretch to $50 only if the product clearly delivers integration and workflow value.
Pricing & positioning
Position Prompt Engine as a workflow layer that complements existing docs and AI tools, not a replacement for them. Keep entry pricing near the current $19/month anchor for individual daily users, and justify higher tiers only with clearer team collaboration, organization, or integration value.
The supplied willingness-to-pay distribution clusters around the current price point, with limited stretch for stronger workflow fit.Price sensitivity appears tied to whether the tool reduces friction versus adding another place to manage prompts.A premium tier could be viable only if it visibly improves integration, reuse, and team-level organization.
Recurring themes
“Right now, my team and I use Google Docs and past ChatGPT threads to manage our AI prompts.”Read Sheri Abshire’s response →
“Prompt Engine sounds like it could save us a lot of time, especially the 'Generate' and 'Organize' features.”Read Sheri Abshire’s response →
“However, my main concern is integration.”Read Santiago Conroy’s response →
Objections to investigate
- Integration with existing tools (Notion, Sheets, Slack)
- Quality consistency compared to manual refinement
- Learning curve and team adoption
- Cost sensitivity vs. current free/low-cost methods
Use these findings to plan customer interviews or experiments. How to interpret AI research
What the panel said
Click a name to open that persona’s full profile.
Sheri AbshireneutralRight now, my team and I use Google Docs and past ChatGPT threads to manage our AI prompts. It's a bit manual, but it works for us. Prompt Engine sounds like it could save us a lot of time, especially the 'Generate' and 'Organize' features. The idea of creating a prompt in under 15 seconds is compelling. However, I'm concerned about how well it would integrate with our specific workflow and if the outputs would truly maintain our brand's authentic voice. I'd be willing to try the $19/month plan to test it out.
Simulated interest: 60/100
Santiago ConroyneutralCurrently, I manage prompt creation manually and within our Notion workspace, supplemented by spreadsheets. The primary benefit Prompt Engine offers is speed, reducing prompt generation from minutes to seconds. However, my main concern is integration. If this tool doesn't seamlessly fit into our existing documentation hierarchy and workflows, it creates more friction than it solves. The advert states a 'Perfect' plan for $19/month, which is within reason for a tool that demonstrably improves efficiency. I would pay a maximum of $20 per month.
Simulated interest: 50/100
Emmy SchondelmaierneutralCurrently, we reuse prompts extensively within our paid prompt library and Notion. Doing it by hand or using basic spreadsheets is too time-consuming for our small team. Prompt Engine's promise of generating professional prompts in seconds and optimizing existing ones is compelling, especially the organization feature for our growing library. However, I'd need to see how it integrates with our current workflow and compare the output quality directly to our established prompt library before committing. The $19/month plan seems reasonable if the time savings are significant, but I'd need to trial it first.
Simulated interest: 70/100
Agastya BhadreshaneutralCurrently, my team and I rely on free ChatGPT accounts and our internal documentation to create prompts for code explanations and client summaries. We copy and paste examples into project notes. Prompt Engine's promise of generating perfect prompts in seconds and consistently high-quality outputs is appealing, especially the optimization feature. It could be better if it integrates seamlessly with our current workflow. What might make it worse is if it requires a steep learning curve for the team or if the results aren't as consistent as claimed across different AI models. The main thing that would keep us on our current system is cost, as we're very cost-conscious. I'd be willing to pay up to $20 per month.
Simulated interest: 60/100
Naudet RousselneutralAh, pour l'instant, nous utilisons principalement des documents partagés pour nos exemples de prompts, que Clara, Julien et moi ajustons manuellement pour chaque nouveau brief. C'est une méthode qui nous permet de garder une touche artisanale, mais elle est très chronophage. L'idée que Prompt Engine puisse générer des prompts en quelques secondes, au lieu des 15 minutes que cela prend souvent, est très attrayante. Si cela pouvait vraiment améliorer la qualité et réduire le temps passé, ce serait un gain considérable pour nous. Cependant, je suis un peu préoccupé par la qualité réelle des prompts générés automatiquement par rapport à notre méthode actuelle. Le prix de $19 par mois pour des générations illimitées semble raisonnable si la promesse est tenue.
Simulated interest: 60/100
Annette FritschpositiveRight now, I'm primarily using Notion to track and refine our AI prompts. The idea of something that can generate perfect prompts in seconds, rather than the 15+ minutes it can take me now, is intriguing. The promise of consistently high-quality outputs and needing less technical expertise to craft them aligns with my goal of streamlining workflows without losing the human touch. It would be better if it integrates seamlessly with how we already work. What would keep me on my current option is if the output felt too robotic or if the cost was prohibitive. I'd be willing to pay around $25 per month, depending on the number of prompt generations included.
Simulated interest: 75/100
Bradley BayerpositiveRight now, I'm using a mix of a paid prompt marketplace extension for campaign ideas and my own Google Sheets for landing page and email snippets. Doing it by hand is definitely time-consuming, and frankly, the outputs can be unpredictable. Prompt Engine sounds promising if it can consistently deliver high-quality outputs in seconds, especially the 'Generate' and 'Optimize' features. That would free me up for more strategic work. The ability to organize prompts is also a plus. I'd need to see how many generations I actually get for $19/month, but if it genuinely cuts down my prompt crafting time and improves results, I could see paying up to $20 per month.
Simulated interest: 75/100
Claire van den BoschneutralCurrently, I rely on a rather disorganized spreadsheet of saved ChatGPT prompts for job ads and candidate outreach. The idea of generating perfect prompts in seconds is appealing, as I spend significant time refining AI output to sound authentically Dutch and professional. Prompt Engine's ability to organize prompts would be a definite improvement over my current system. However, I need assurance regarding data security and how easily it integrates with my existing workflow. I would need to see quantifiable time savings before investing. I would be willing to pay a maximum of $19 per month for this service.
Simulated interest: 70/100
Kanak KhatrineutralCurrently, our team manages prompt structures across spreadsheets, Slack threads, and shared drives. It's quite fragmented. Prompt Engine's promise of generating professional prompts in seconds and organizing them into a library sounds appealing, especially for speeding up our workflow and ensuring consistency, which is a real pain point for us right now. However, I'd need to see how easily it integrates with our existing tools and if the 'optimization' feature genuinely improves output beyond what our experienced editors can already achieve. The biggest hurdle would be ensuring it doesn't create another silo or require extensive training for the team. I'd consider paying around $50 per month, but that depends heavily on the actual functionality and team adoption.
Simulated interest: 60/100
Barbara Cadena MurilloneutralCurrently, I manage my prompts across ChatGPT and Notion, which is quite fragmented. I'm looking for a more organized system. The ability to generate and optimize prompts quickly, as described, is appealing, especially the idea of a centralized library. However, I'm concerned about the ROI for standalone subscriptions, given my budget. I'd need to see a clear benefit that outweighs the current effort. The $19/month plan seems like a reasonable starting point if it truly solves the retrieval and refinement issues I face.
Simulated interest: 60/100
Keep exploring.
Find your next question or see which topics divide AI panels.
What would you ask next?
Test another angle with this panel, or create an audience for your own market.