What do you use today instead of Isometic Studio (https://isometic.studio) (a competitor, a spreadsheet, doing it by hand)? Compared with that, what would make Isometic Studio better or worse for you, and what would keep you on your current option? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Leticia Dooleyneutral

Right now, I'm using Figma and Canva, and we have a shared asset folder. We often need isometric scenes for roadmap slides and campaign pages, so I'm constantly sketching these out by hand or trying to adapt existing templates. The idea of an 'AI Agent' and ready-made shapes is appealing, as it could definitely speed things up. However, I'm not sure how well it integrates with our existing workflow or if it can handle the complexity we sometimes need. The 'One-Time Pass' at $19 sounds interesting for lifetime access to more tools and SVG export, but I'd need to understand the limitations of the 'Free' tier and if the one-time payment covers commercial use for our B2B SaaS assets. If the $19 one-time pass includes all features needed for commercial use and integrates smoothly, that might be worth it.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Morris Reilly-Morissetteneutral

Currently, I'm building isometric scenes manually in Illustrator, which is quite time-consuming, especially when adapting existing brand kits. The process can become repetitive, particularly drawing out 3D shapes. The idea of a "Ready to Use Shapes" library and the "Image To Isometric" converter is appealing as it could potentially shave hours off my workflow. However, I'm skeptical about the AI agent's capabilities and how well it integrates with my existing process. I'd need to see a clear demonstration of how it simplifies complexity rather than adding another layer. A one-time pass for $19 seems reasonable to explore these features more thoroughly, especially with SVG export.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Sujata Sharmaneutral

Currently, I create isometric graphics manually in After Effects or Figma, often by building shapes from scratch or adapting existing assets from our library. It takes a lot of time to get the perspective just right. Isometic Studio's ability to quickly generate these shapes and even convert images would be a huge time-saver, and the AI agent for animation sounds intriguing. However, I'm concerned about how well it integrates with our existing workflow and if the export options are sufficient for our needs. The $19 "One-Time Pass" sounds appealing for lifetime access, but I'd need to understand the limitations compared to a subscription model, if one exists. I could potentially pay $15 per month for a feature-rich subscription.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Thore Stifelneutral

Currently, I create diagrams and visuals by hand in Figma, which works well for my needs. The prospect of using an AI agent to generate isometric illustrations quickly is interesting, but I'm not sure how it would integrate with my current workflow of exporting SVGs for documentation. The 'Image to Isometric' feature sounds promising for converting existing assets. However, I primarily need tools for explaining system states and workflows, not necessarily for creating standalone isometric illustrations. The pricing of $19 for a One-Time Pass with SVG exports is acceptable, but I'd need to see if it truly saves me time compared to my current methods.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Levi Crookspositive

Right now, I'm using free illustration packs for graphics on my landing page and in presentations. It's a bit manual, selecting and tweaking them, but it works for my pre-seed stage. If Isometic Studio could significantly speed up the process of creating custom, professional-looking isometric graphics, that would be a huge win. The ability to easily export in SVG is also appealing for scalability. However, the 'One-Time Pass' at $19 for lifetime access seems like the most relevant offer for me. It includes features like the pen tool and advanced shape builder, which are crucial. I'd be willing to pay $19 for a lifetime pass.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Mette van den Bergneutral

Currently, I'm manually creating isometric shapes in Figma, which is time-consuming. Isometic Studio's ability to generate custom shapes quickly with its pen tool and shape builder sounds appealing. The AI agent for animation is also interesting, though I'd need to see how well it integrates with my workflow. What I'd need to know is if the export options are robust enough for client work and if the "local first" approach is truly seamless. The free tier looks good for testing, but a one-time pass at $19 seems like a fair investment if it proves efficient.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Cody Murrayneutral

Currently, I rely on PowerPoint for most of my visual creation, supplemented by a company icon library. If Isometic Studio could directly integrate with or easily import assets from PowerPoint, that would be a significant advantage. The ability to generate isometric illustrations quickly, especially with the AI agent and the 'Image To Isometric' feature, is appealing for creating more dynamic visuals for our e-learning modules. However, the 'One-Time Pass' for $19 seems to offer limited access to shapes and lacks the AI agent. The monthly pricing isn't clear, and without knowing the full feature set for a subscription, it's hard to assess. I would be willing to pay around $15 per month for a subscription that includes the AI agent and a comprehensive shape library, provided it integrates smoothly into my existing workflow.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Rameshwar Varmaneutral

Right now, I create isometric visuals by building shapes from scratch in Illustrator and then animating them in After Effects. It's a bit time-consuming, especially when I need to adapt assets for various sizes for web and social media. The idea of generating them faster with ready-made shapes or an AI agent is appealing. Being able to convert images directly to isometric shapes also sounds efficient. However, I'd need to see how the AI agent works and if the ready-made shapes are flexible enough for my startup clients' branding needs. My biggest concern is workflow integration; if it significantly disrupts my current process or requires a steep learning curve, it might not be worth it. For the features offered, I'd consider paying around $15 per month, but that's contingent on the tool actually saving me significant time.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Joann Kuhlmanneutral

Right now, I primarily use Lucidchart, Notion, and Google Slides for creating diagrams and process visuals. I'm always looking for ways to streamline things, so the idea of creating isometric illustrations faster is intriguing. The AI agent and advanced shape builder could definitely be beneficial for creating more complex visuals for our help articles and sales demos, potentially saving me time compared to building everything manually or relying solely on templates. However, I'm not sure how well it would integrate with my current workflow or if it offers the level of customization I need for our specific process diagrams. The $19 one-time pass seems reasonable for lifetime access to those features, but I'd need to see a more comprehensive comparison to my existing tools to determine if it's a better overall solution.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Russell Rutherford-Shanahanneutral

Today, I'm primarily using Figma and our shared illustration kit to build campaign assets. If Isometic Studio could significantly speed up the creation of isometric illustrations, that would be a definite advantage. The ability to convert images directly into isometric shapes and the 'ready to use shapes' sound promising for efficiency. However, I'd need to see how it integrates with our existing workflow and if the export options are robust enough for our needs. I'm also curious about the "AI Agent" functionality – does it genuinely simplify the process or add complexity? My maximum would be $15 per month, based on the 'One-Time Pass' being $19 for lifetime access, which suggests a lower monthly value for ongoing use.

Simulated interest: 60/100