What do you use today instead of Voicestars (https://www.voicestars.co/) (a competitor, a spreadsheet, doing it by hand)? Compared with that, what would make Voicestars better or worse for you, and what would keep you on your current option? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Lorenzo Beattyneutral

Right now, I'm using a mix of FL Studio and some free online voice tools to create my parody shorts. It's a bit of a manual process, but I've got it down. The idea of having a vast library of artist voices and a song generator is definitely appealing. If Voicestars could significantly speed up my workflow and offer unique vocal textures I can't easily create myself, that would be a huge win. However, I'd need to see how easily it integrates with my existing process. I'm hesitant to pay too much for a subscription, especially with ad revenue being unpredictable. I'd be willing to pay up to $15 per month, but that's contingent on the quality and time savings it provides.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Marguerite Predovic-Dooleynegative

Currently, I use AI voice demos as rough placeholders for my video edits. I generate these myself, so it's essentially doing it by hand in that sense. What would make Voicestars better is if it offered more subtle, nuanced voices that could pass for actual human talent, rather than just generic celebrity impersonations. The current AI voices seem geared towards music production, not my specific need for placeholder narration. If it can't provide that human touch, it's not a significant improvement. I'm not looking to create AI music covers or clone artist voices; I just need efficient placeholders. Given that, I wouldn't pay for this service.

Simulated interest: 20/100

Julian Leyckesneutral

Right now, I’m mocking up choral arrangements using Suno’s voice-cloning tools, but it’s a clunky process. I’d use something like Voicestars to streamline testing vocal ideas on beats I’m sequencing. The biggest trouble with my current workflow is that Suno’s tools are more about generating ideas than refining them—I end up spending too much time tweaking. Voicestars’ promise of quicker turnarounds and 600+ artist-style voices could speed up my process, but I’d need to know how accurate the voice models are for European vocal inflections. If it saves me 3+ hours a week, that’s worth something. I wouldn’t pay more than $15/month, partly because I’d need to see if the output is something I can’t already mock up with free tools or my own vocal layering.

Simulated interest: 45/100

Shresthi Singhneutral

Right now, I'm using Adobe Premiere and some AI voiceover tools I've found online, which are usually free or have a one-time purchase. Voicestars seems interesting because of the variety of voices, but I'm not sure if it offers more than I already have. The main draw would be better quality or unique voices I can't find elsewhere. I'm a bit concerned about the pricing model; I'd prefer a pay-as-you-go or a very low monthly fee. Something around $10 USD per month would be my absolute max to experiment with.

Simulated interest: 25/100

Mathew Gutmannnegative

I currently use Descript and similar tools for my podcast editing, which involves cleaning dialogue, cutting clips, and creating short VO samples. Voicestars seems focused on AI music generation and voice cloning for creative, often entertainment-based purposes. While it has tools like a noise remover, its core functionality doesn't directly align with my client work of polishing spoken word content for podcasts. The pricing structure is also credit-based, which is unclear for my specific needs. I wouldn't pay for it.

Simulated interest: 0/100

Rodney Gorczanyneutral

Right now, for me, it's all about free tools and whatever I can cobble together. So, I'm using browser tools and a basic DAW for joke covers and voice parodies. If Voicestars could do that, like, really easily generate covers with different celeb voices without me spending ages editing, that'd be sick. But honestly, the main thing is cost. I'm always skint, so anything that's not free or super cheap is a no-go. If it were, like, $5 a month, maybe, but more than that? Nah, I'm good with what I've got for now.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Coline Carreneutral

Currently, I'm experimenting with AI voice generation by creating alternate vocal mockups for our artists. I'm using various standalone software and online tools, often on a per-project basis or through trials. For me, Voicestars' advantage would be its breadth of voices and the potential for seamless integration into my workflow, especially if it offers unique or ethically sourced artist voices. However, I'm concerned about the quality and authenticity of the AI voices, and how they align with our artists' integrity. The pricing is also a bit unclear with the credit system – it's hard to estimate usage for my specific needs without more context. I would be willing to pay around $20 per month for a service like this, provided it offers significant value and ease of use.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Devagya Asanneutral

Currently, I'm using AI tools to generate temporary narration and jingles for my explainer videos. This process is quite manual, involving a lot of tweaking to get the right tone and style. Voicestars' ability to generate AI covers and songs from prompts sounds interesting, but my primary need is for clear, professional-sounding narration, not necessarily musical covers. The voice cloning feature is intriguing, especially for matching specific client tones. However, I'm not sure if it can produce the distinct, character-driven narration I sometimes require. If it can deliver high-quality, customizable voiceovers for explainer videos and app demos, it would be significantly better than my current method. I'd be willing to pay up to $20 per month for such a service.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Timothy Rodriguezneutral

Right now, I'm using a mix of free AI voice tools and hired voice actors for placeholder reads in our trailers. Voicestars could potentially speed up my workflow, but I'd need to be sure the AI voices sound authentic enough for serious indie game production. The demo voices sound promising, but I'd have to test our own scripts through it to see if it captures the right emotional nuance for our narrative game. The biggest challenge with free tools is the robotic quality—if this can deliver more natural-sounding voices, it might be worth it. I'm skeptical about the voice cloning feature, though; our legal budget is zero, and I'd need to confirm it's safe for our use case. The pricing seems reasonable, but I'd need to calculate how many credits we'd burn through per project. Right now, I'd probably max out at about $20 a month—just enough to explore without overcommitting.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Joy van der Meerneutral

Right now, I'm using a competitor's voice and music generator for rough cuts, and I manually tweak the audio in CapCut. Voicestars seems focused on music covers and cloning existing artist voices, which isn't quite what I need for podcast promos. My main concern is maintaining authenticity and avoiding that 'uncanny valley' feel. If Voicestars could generate natural-sounding voice variations of our own hosts, that would be a significant improvement. However, the focus on music might be a distraction. I'd be willing to pay around $15 per month if it demonstrably improved the quality and speed of creating short social clips without sounding robotic.

Simulated interest: 40/100