What do you use today instead of TypeMotion (https://www.typemotion.art/) (a competitor, a spreadsheet, doing it by hand)? Compared with that, what would make TypeMotion better or worse for you, and what would keep you on your current option? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Doreen O'Reillypositive

Right now, I'm mostly using CapCut for video edits and some browser-based tools for text animation. I also dabble with Canva, but it's pretty basic for motion graphics. TypeMotion looks like it could be way more streamlined for creating animated text effects compared to what I'm doing now, especially with the templates. It would be better if it was super intuitive and quick to get professional-looking results. I'd stick with my current tools if TypeMotion had a steep learning curve or if the customization options felt too limited for our brand. I'd be willing to pay around $9.99 per month for this, especially if it means saving time on content creation.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Delbert Carterneutral

Right now, I rely on Premiere Pro and After Effects, using my own library of motion presets to get things done quickly. I tried a browser-based tool recently, but it felt too restrictive. TypeMotion looks like it might offer faster ways to prototype simple titles, which could be useful, but I'm wary of anything that sacrifices granular control. The limitations of browser-based editing are a concern, and I'd need to see if it offers more than just templates. I'd be willing to pay $5 per month for flexible access, but only if it truly speeds up my workflow without compromising quality.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Rike Trautmannneutral

Currently, I’m using a combination of Google Slides and Figma for my text animations, along with spreadsheets to manage timing. It’s clunky, but it works—mostly. TypeMotion’s browser-based templates could save me a ton of time, especially with kinetic typography effects I’m manually creating in Slides. The ability to preview instantly and export video-ready projects is tempting, but I’d need to see how it fits into my design system workflow. The main risk is breaking my existing templates and processes. I’d consider paying $9.99/month, but only if it integrates smoothly with my current tools and doesn’t disrupt workflows. Right now, my free trial credits would cover testing, so I won’t pay upfront.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Kannen Shahpositive

Currently, I'm handling text motion by manually adjusting it within our main animation software, which can be quite time-consuming, especially for multilingual content. The idea of using pre-built templates and a dedicated studio like TypeMotion is appealing because it could significantly speed up my workflow and ensure consistency. The ability to preview instantly and tune motion within a browser is a definite advantage over my current process. However, I'd need to see how easily it integrates with our existing pipeline and if the template customization is flexible enough. My maximum acceptable price would be $9.99 per month, as advertised, given my budget and the need for ongoing access.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Katie Thielneutral

Right now, I'm mostly using my phone and apps like CapCut, along with Canva for graphics. It's functional, but I'm looking for something that can create more dynamic text animations. TypeMotion seems like it could offer that ease of use with templates, which is a big plus. However, I'm not sure how much control I'd have over customization versus just picking a template. If it's truly straightforward and saves me time without a steep learning curve, that would be its advantage. What would keep me on my current method is if TypeMotion is too complicated or doesn't offer enough unique styles. I'd be willing to pay around $10 per month for this.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Jack Wunschpositive

Currently, I'm relying on PowerPoint and Canva for creating animated content, which can be quite time-consuming given their limitations for more dynamic effects. If TypeMotion could offer smoother, more professional-looking animations with less effort than I'm currently expending, that would be a definite advantage. The main thing that would keep me using my existing tools is if TypeMotion wasn't intuitive or if the output still required a lot of tweaking to meet our university's brand guidelines. I'd be willing to pay around $10 per month for flexible access, assuming it truly streamlines my workflow and produces high-quality results.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Charlotte van der Veldenneutral

Currently, I'm using After Effects with my own library of reusable brand rigs and templates for text animations, which is quite efficient. If TypeMotion could offer truly unique, complex animations that I can't easily replicate or that save me significant time beyond my existing setup, it would be compelling. However, I'd be concerned about its flexibility within strict brand guidelines and potential limitations compared to After Effects. My current workflow is robust, so any new tool needs to clearly demonstrate a substantial improvement. I'd be willing to pay around $10 per month, but only if it significantly streamlines my process for specific tasks.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Mathew Schillerpositive

Right now, I'm doing all my titles and captions manually in Final Cut Pro. It’s a real bottleneck, taking up hours that I’d rather spend creating content. TypeMotion looks like it could automate that, which is the main draw. The templates seem functional, but I’d need to see if they can be customized enough to fit my brand. The biggest question is how much time it *actually* saves compared to my current process and if the output quality is consistent. If it streamlines the process significantly without compromising the final look, I’d consider it. I'd pay around $20 per month, assuming it delivers on its promise of efficiency.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Amande Gauthierneutral

Currently, we're relying on a mix of Figma for initial concepts and a browser-based tool for our teaser reels, which works for basic kinetic typography. Doing it by hand is not an option given our deadlines. TypeMotion seems interesting because it offers templates and specific text effects like typewriter and blur, which could save time. However, I'm concerned about how easily these animations can be exported and integrated into our workflow, especially since my team uses various tools. The $9.99/month price point is quite reasonable for flexible access, and the yearly plan at $49.99/yr offers good value if it truly streamlines our process. I'd be willing to pay up to $15 per month to try it out and see if it fits our needs.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Brahma Panickerneutral

Right now, I mostly build animated text and intro frames using free template packs and tools like Canva or DaVinci Resolve. The main challenge is finding exactly the right motion or style I need, and sometimes it takes a lot of tweaking. If TypeMotion offers a much faster way to achieve professional-looking effects that I can't easily replicate, especially with good customization for subtitles and titles, that would be a big plus. However, I'm always looking for efficiency without breaking the bank. The $9.99/mo plan seems reasonable if it genuinely saves me time on multiple projects, but I'd need to see if the free trial gives me enough credits to really test it out. If it's just a few credits, it's hard to say. My maximum would be around $5 per month.

Simulated interest: 60/100