What do you use today instead of Superpower Social (https://superpower.social/) (a competitor, a spreadsheet, doing it by hand)? Compared with that, what would make Superpower Social better or worse for you, and what would keep you on your current option? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Craig Funkpositive

Right now, I'm manually reviewing ad comments and coordinating with a junior contractor using a shared spreadsheet. It's incredibly time-consuming and frankly, I worry about scaling it effectively as our ad spend grows. If Superpower could truly automate the hiding of spam, scams, and negative comments, that would be a significant time-saver and reduce my anxiety about brand reputation. The idea of AI reading intent rather than just keywords is compelling. The main concern would be if the AI misses too many or flags things incorrectly, requiring more manual oversight than it saves. I'd be willing to pay around $150 per month to see if it genuinely streamlines this process and reduces the pressure.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Julie Leschneutral

Right now, my team and I manage comment moderation using a competitor tool for some of the process and a shared SOP document, with my two assistants handling the bulk of the review. It's quite manual and fragmented. Superpower Social sounds appealing because it promises AI-driven moderation that reads intent, not just keywords, which could significantly reduce false positives and the manual effort involved. The key differentiator for me would be guaranteed consistency and accuracy, especially for my high-stakes clients. I'd need to see clear ROI, but if it genuinely streamlines the process and protects brand reputation without introducing new problems, I could see myself paying around $150 per month.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Bhargava Khannaneutral

Right now, I'm personally handling all our Facebook ad comment moderation directly through Meta Business Suite. It's very hands-on, but I find it's the best way to catch customer sentiment and spot spam patterns, which helps inform our strategy. A spreadsheet isn't really feasible for the volume we get. Superpower Social sounds interesting because it claims to automate moderation and replies, which could save significant time. However, I'm hesitant about fully automating replies and the "human in the loop" aspect needs to be genuinely efficient, not just another notification stream. I'd need to see how well it truly understands brand voice and can distinguish between spam and genuine customer inquiries. The pricing isn't clear on the page, so I can't estimate a maximum. I'd pay around $75 per month if it proved to be a significant time-saver and genuinely effective without requiring excessive manual oversight.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Maren Helmneutral

Currently, I use Meta's native tools and an Airtable log for comment moderation. While it's a controlled system, the sheer volume of comments on our popular ads can be overwhelming, and we don't have a dedicated customer service team to ensure timely responses. Superpower Social's AI moderation sounds appealing as it could automate hiding toxic comments and drafting replies, freeing up my team's time. However, I'm concerned about the AI's ability to truly capture our brand voice and handle complex customer issues. I'd need to see a robust human-in-the-loop process. Given our budget constraints and preference for a streamlined stack, I would consider paying up to $75 per month, potentially more if it significantly reduced manual effort and improved response times without introducing new complexities.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Henri Robertneutral

Currently, I use a competitor platform for two of my four e-commerce clients to manage their Facebook ad comments. For the other two, it's manual, which is quite inefficient and depends on client availability. Superpower Social sounds promising because it automates moderation and can draft replies, which would save me significant time. The "Human In the Loop" approach seems sensible, ensuring edge cases are handled. What's unclear is the pricing structure – is it per client, per platform, or a flat fee? Given my current needs, I'd be willing to pay around $75 per month if it covers all four clients effectively. If it's priced per client, that changes the equation.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Mildred Bashirianneutral

Right now, my coworker Ben and I manually review all our Facebook ad comments. It's built into our daily QA, especially during launches. Superpower's AI moderation sounds great for filtering spam and bots, which is a huge time sink. I'm a bit concerned about the AI missing nuances in tone, though, as we're hyper-vigilant about our brand voice. If it can accurately catch negativity without hiding genuine customer feedback, that would be amazing. I'd be willing to pay around $150 per month for something that genuinely saves us hours and protects our brand sentiment.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Ian Cassinneutral

Right now, Chloe and Ben manage our Facebook ads and I manually track and log comment issues in a spreadsheet. It's a tedious but necessary part of keeping things clean. Superpower Social sounds like it could automate a lot of that. The idea of hiding toxic comments automatically is appealing, as is drafting replies. However, I'd need to see how well it handles our specific brand voice and if it can genuinely understand intent rather than just keywords, especially with our customer base. The cost isn't immediately clear, and I'm always cautious about new tools eating into our tight budget. I'd be willing to pay up to $100 per month, but that would depend heavily on a successful trial and demonstrating clear time savings.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Anila Shuklapositive

Right now, I use a shared spreadsheet and do a lot of manual flagging and updating. It's time-consuming, and honestly, the volume of spam comments is overwhelming. Superpower Social sounds like it could be a significant improvement by automating the hiding of toxic comments and potentially drafting replies. This would free up so much of my time. My main concern would be ensuring the AI accurately interprets comments and doesn't hide legitimate ones. If it can reliably handle the bulk of the spam and scams, it would be invaluable. I'd be willing to pay around $50 per month.

Simulated interest: 85/100

Hendrik van der Meerneutral

At the moment, my marketing team handles our Facebook ad comments manually. We filter through them and escalate sensitive ones. The idea of an AI moderating toxic comments before they cause issues is certainly appealing, as it's becoming a significant time sink during our product drops. However, I'd need to understand how well it truly grasps intent beyond keywords, especially for nuanced feedback. The crucial part is maintaining our brand's authentic voice; if the AI can truly replicate that, it would be a huge improvement. If it can reliably filter the spam and negativity, freeing up my team for more strategic tasks, I would consider paying up to $150 per month.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Ernestine Nienowneutral

Right now, my team and I manually moderate comments. I also keep a spreadsheet of common spam patterns. The biggest advantage of Superpower Social would be the time savings. My main concern is whether the AI truly understands intent and nuance, not just keywords. I've been burned by black-box solutions before. If it consistently catches everything I'm looking for and doesn't miss critical comments or flag good ones, that would be a huge win. I'd be willing to pay up to $150 per month, monthly, to see if it can handle the load.

Simulated interest: 60/100