What would stop you from trying FixBugs (https://fixbugs.ai) this month? Be specific about how you handle this today. Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Roland Connneutral

This FixBugs product sounds interesting, especially the automated root cause analysis and validated fix generation. Today, my process involves manually checking Sentry, PagerDuty, and logs, then documenting and verifying fixes. What concerns me about adopting FixBugs immediately is the integration with our current stack and the potential for false positives or incorrect fixes that might actually introduce new issues. I'd need to see evidence of its accuracy and reliability in a production fintech environment. The pricing isn't clear upfront, but based on similar tools and the value it promises in reducing on-call burden, I might consider up to $200 per month.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Gretchen Halvorsonneutral

My current process involves manually triaging alerts and coordinating investigations, which is time-consuming. While FixBugs promises automation, I'd need to understand how it integrates with our existing Jira workflow and the exact nature of the "validated fix." The page mentions a free trial covering 3 end-to-end bug triages, which is a good starting point. However, the pricing is unclear; I see a "See Plans" link but no specific monthly figures for a team of my size. Without clear pricing, I cannot commit to a monthly cost. If pricing were transparent, I would consider up to $150 per month for a solution that demonstrably reduces my team's incident handling overhead.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Ludwig Grötzingerneutral

The primary reason I'd hesitate to try FixBugs this month is the lack of clear pricing on the website. It mentions a "free trial covers 3 end to end bug triages," but beyond that, I'm unsure about the ongoing costs. My team currently uses Sentry, Datadog, and PagerDuty, so integrating another tool requires careful evaluation of value and budget. I'd need to understand the pricing structure, especially if it's per-fix or a tiered subscription, before committing. Given our existing toolset and my frugal nature, I would pay a maximum of $150 per month, assuming it offers significant time savings.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Jyoti Patelneutral

This month, what would stop me is the immediate need to reproduce and fix intermittent bugs that have been causing issues lately. My current process involves a lot of manual effort in Jira and spreadsheets to track these, followed by detailed reproduction steps on staging. While FixBugs sounds promising, especially the automated analysis and fix validation, I'd need to understand how it handles our specific integrations and if it can truly reduce the manual triage overhead we're experiencing. The pricing isn't clearly stated for our team size, but I'd be willing to pay up to $150 per month for a solution that demonstrably saves us significant manual effort.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Vigile Brunetneutral

My primary concern with trying FixBugs this month would be integrating it smoothly into our current workflow. Right now, my backend engineer and I manually sift through alerts and logs, then use GitHub issues for tracking. I'd need to see how seamlessly FixBugs can ingest our existing data and if its "automated analysis" and "generated diffs" truly save us time without introducing new complexities. The idea of "zero effort debugging" is appealing, but I'd want to ensure it doesn't create more work in validation or configuration. I'm willing to try it out with the free trial that covers 3 end-to-end bug triages, but I wouldn't pay more than $150 per month for this service, assuming it scales appropriately with our usage.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Debbie Rennerneutral

The main thing stopping me from trying FixBugs this month is that our current incident logging process in Notion is working well for us. We're a small team of two platform engineers, so we have a pretty tight grip on everything. I manually review alerts from CloudWatch and Grafana, check deploy diffs and feature flags, and meticulously log all incidents and validation steps. While the idea of an AI agent triaging and fixing bugs sounds appealing, I'd need to understand how it integrates with our existing Notion workflow and how much manual oversight is required. Does it just generate PRs, or does it require me to manually push them and handle the follow-up? The "Free trial covers 3 end to end bug triages" is a bit vague regarding the scope of those triages. I would be willing to pay up to $50 per month for a trial to see if it genuinely saves me time without adding overhead.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Ian Meeuwisneutral

Honestly, the biggest thing stopping me from trying FixBugs this month is the current budget situation. We’re already paying for BugSnag and the hosted status/alert stack, so adding another tool feels tricky. I’d need to see a clear ROI, especially with how tight budgets have become. I’d also want to test it hands-on first to ensure it actually reduces the noisy alerts and improves bug detection. Right now, I’d say $500/month is my absolute top budget for new tools like this. The idea of automating alert triage and bugfixing is appealing, but I’m cautious by nature—especially with something as critical as our checkout flow. Integration with GitHub and VS Code is a plus, but I’d need confirmation it won’t disrupt our current workflows.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Ferdynanda Smolińskineutral

What would stop me from trying FixBugs this month is primarily the lack of concrete details on pricing. The site mentions pricing, but doesn't show it directly on the main page, and I'm wary of tools that aren't transparent upfront. Today, I handle alerts by triaging them manually in Linear, using custom Python scripts to parse logs, and then reproduce bugs with my own scripts and spreadsheets. I need to see a pilot or clear documentation demonstrating efficacy before committing, especially since my team is small and resource-constrained. I'd be willing to pay $50 per month, but only if the pricing basis and features align with my current needs.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Wade Trantowneutral

Right then, what would stop me? Frankly, the biggest hurdle is always convincing myself and the team that a new tool isn't just another shiny object. We currently manage bug triage through Jira and spreadsheets, which is time-consuming, I'll grant you. I'd need to see clear evidence this AI actually reduces that manual effort without introducing new complexities. The promise of 'autonomous bug fixing' sounds good, but I'm skeptical of magic bullets. I'd want to understand how it integrates with our existing Jira workflows and how 'validated fixes' are truly validated before they hit our release pipeline. My current process involves digging into incident reviews myself, so I'd need to be convinced this doesn't just automate the busywork but actually solves the root problem more efficiently. I'd be willing to consider it, but I wouldn't pay more than $150 per month for this kind of solution.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Dharmaketu Desai-Khannaneutral

The sheer volume of PagerDuty alerts can be overwhelming, and our current logging isn't standardized, making root cause analysis difficult. I'd need to see how FixBugs integrates with our specific stack, especially Prometheus, and how it handles the lack of consistent logging. We also have a backlog of infrastructure improvements, so I'd need to balance this with existing projects. A trial would be essential to validate its effectiveness before committing financially. If it proves valuable, I might consider paying up to $50 per month.

Simulated interest: 40/100