Looking at Olympus Analytics (https://olympusanalytics.neocities.org/): what price would make it a no-brainer for you, and at what price would you stop considering it? What would you expect to get for that money? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Page reviewed

Free Vendor Contact List Sample (CSV) | Olympus Analytics

https://olympusanalytics.neocities.org/ (opens in a new tab)
Saved screenshot of Free Vendor Contact List Sample (CSV) | Olympus Analytics
Screenshot saved with this question. The live page may have changed.Open full image ↗

10 fictional AI personas. Exploratory perspectives, not a survey of real customers. Methodology & limitations

Simulated interest

55/100

AI synthesis, not measured demand

Suggested price range

$50–150

Median $75 · simulated willingness to pay

Response sentiment

Positive 20%Neutral 80%Negative 0%
The takeaway

What this panel suggests

Synthetic responses show moderate interest and mostly neutral reactions, with pricing judged through a value-per-contact lens rather than a brand or feature lens. The main tension is that small packs can feel expensive on a per-row basis, while larger packs start to look more reasonable because the contact cost drops. Buyers generally want a clean CSV with contact person, phone, email, county, and trade category, plus confidence that the data is current and sourced from official public records. The free sample matters because it reduces risk and helps them verify format and usefulness before paying. For pricing, the center of gravity is around $75, with a lower comfort zone near $50 and an upper limit around $150 for stronger or broader offerings. Recurring pricing is not rejected outright, but it needs clearer scope: some respondents want more frequent updates or broader coverage before committing monthly. Overall, the audience is not pushing back on the concept; they are mainly asking whether the list quality, freshness, and volume justify the spend.

A hypothesis to test

Pricing & positioning

Keep the first paid tier near the median willingness to pay, with a strong free sample and very clear sizing of what each pack contains. The clearest fit appears to be buyers who want a clean CSV of public vendor contacts and can justify the spend through time saved on list building.

A no-brainer zone looks closer to $50-$75 than to the current top end, especially if the buyer is evaluating a single-state list.Interest softens as the price approaches or exceeds $150 unless the offer includes broader coverage, fresher updates, or highly targeted filtering.The recurring plan needs a sharper explanation of what "updated list" means and why it is worth paying monthly instead of buying a one-time pack.

Recurring themes

Value per contact vs. volume
“For $49 for about 50 contacts, that's about $1 per contact, which is a bit steep for me.”Read Chelsea Bode’s response →
Data quality and verification
“I'd expect clean, accurate data with contact person, phone, email, county, and trade category, as advertised.”Read Améthyste Roussel’s response →
Recurring value proposition
“If the monthly refresh option ($99/mo) offered broader coverage or more frequent updates, that might be acceptable”Read Yasin Jamrozy’s response →

Objections to investigate

  • High cost per contact for small packs
  • Unclear scope of recurring updates
  • Manual effort required for verification

Use these findings to plan customer interviews or experiments. How to interpret AI research

What the panel said

Click a name to open that persona’s full profile.

David Andersonneutral

The idea of getting vendor lists from public records is definitely interesting, especially since I spend so much time building similar lists myself. The "no-brainer" price for me would be around $20-$30 for a single-state pack, assuming the data is clean and truly provides new contacts. I'd expect around 200-300 contacts for that price, given the $0.50/contact rate in the Premium pack. Anything over $50 for a single-state pack would make me pause, and I'd definitely stop considering it if it approached $100 for one state. For monthly recurring data, I might consider up to $150/month if it was consistently updated and covered multiple states or more granular filtering options, but the current pricing structure is a bit unclear on recurring value beyond a single snapshot.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Chelsea Bodeneutral

This 'Olympus Analytics' sounds like it could be a useful tool for keeping my vendor lists updated, especially since they pull from public records. For $49 for about 50 contacts, that's about $1 per contact, which is a bit steep for me. A 'no-brainer' price would be if I could get a much larger list, say 500 contacts, for around $50. For that, I'd expect to get all the key details like contact person, phone, email, and trade category, along with the snapshot date for verification. If the price for a substantial list, like the 'Premium' pack which offers ~300 contacts for $149, went up to $200, I'd probably stop considering it. I'd pay a maximum of $50 per month for a service like this, provided it offered comprehensive and up-to-date regional vendor information.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Anal Guhapositive

This looks interesting, especially the "Premium" pack at $149 for about 300 contacts, which comes out to about $0.50 per contact. That's quite efficient. For my business, where I'm meticulously building vendor lists from public records, this could be a significant time-saver. A 'no-brainer' price would be around $50 for a pack of this size, given the potential efficiency gains. I'd stop considering it if it went much higher, perhaps over $100 for the same volume. I'm not looking for a monthly subscription right now, as my needs are more project-based, but if I were, I'd expect a substantial discount for a recurring commitment. My maximum would be $100 per item for a pack of 300 contacts.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Yasin Jamrozyneutral

This product's pricing structure is a bit unclear for a recurring need. A "no-brainer" for me would be a comprehensive list of vendors for the entire DACH region, regularly updated, for around $75 per month. I'm hesitant to commit to a one-time purchase because I need continuous data to feed our pipeline. If the monthly refresh option ($99/mo) offered broader coverage or more frequent updates, that might be acceptable, but I'd need to understand the scope of "new vendors in your counties."

Simulated interest: 60/100

Améthyste Rousselneutral

For a one-time purchase, a "no-brainer" price for the Premium pack with around 300 contacts would be $99. I'd stop considering it if it exceeded $199, as the value diminishes rapidly beyond that. For that price, I'd expect clean, accurate data with contact person, phone, email, county, and trade category, as advertised. The monthly subscription options are less appealing given my current freelance setup; I'd realistically only consider up to $49 per month for a 'White-Label' service if it truly saved me significant manual effort, but given my preference for direct control and the current pricing structure, my maximum monthly spend would be $0.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Mike Lehnerneutral

This looks like a potentially useful tool, especially the "Monthly Refresh" at $99/mo. My main concern is the actual quality and depth of the data. I spend a lot of time verifying contact roles and trades myself, so I'd need to see that this list is significantly cleaner than what I can pull from Apollo and public records. A no-brainer price for me would be around $50 per month, assuming it consistently saves me at least 5-10 hours of manual scrubbing weekly. Anything over $150 a month, and I'd start questioning the ROI and whether it's worth the time to integrate. I'd expect at least 500-1000 regularly updated, accurate contacts for that $99/mo. My maximum acceptable price per month is $99 USD.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Bobbi Sandersneutral

The idea of clean B2B vendor lists from public records is interesting, especially if it saves me from manually sifting through directories. For a "no-brainer" price, I'd be looking at something very low, perhaps around $25 for a single state pack to see the quality. I would stop considering it if it cost more than $75 for a single state, as that feels quite high for what is essentially compiled public data. For that price, I'd expect contact person, phone, email, address, and crucially, the trade category, all accurately presented. I'm not sure about a monthly subscription price, as my current task is to maintain an existing spreadsheet, not continuously buy new lists. The pricing for the 'Monthly Refresh' at $99/mo seems high for my needs unless it's providing very specific, up-to-date leads that I can't get myself.

Simulated interest: 40/100

Upendra Shuklapositive

The idea of getting vendor contacts from public records is exactly how I operate, but doing it manually takes ages. I'd consider a 'no-brainer' price around $50-$75 per state for a comprehensive, up-to-date list. If it were over $150 per state, I'd start questioning the value proposition compared to my own time. For that price, I'd expect contact person, phone, email, address, and crucially, a clear indication of their trade category and any certifications. The monthly refresh at $99/mo sounds interesting if it's truly automated and covers a broad range of vendors I use, but I'd need to see how many new contacts it actually yields. My absolute maximum for a recurring monthly list would be $50 USD.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Lucia Nitzscheneutral

The 'no-brainer' price for me would be something like the $49 'Basic' pack, assuming it covers Yorkshire and has a decent number of contacts relevant to local SMEs. That price point feels reasonable for a one-off list if it saves me hours of manual searching. I'd stop considering it if the price for a single state pack exceeded £100, as my income is £55,000 and I need to be mindful of costs. Ideally, I'd expect contact person, phone, email, and crucially, the trade category and local council area to match specific tender requirements. A monthly subscription for updated lists at around $99/mo seems high given my current workload and income; I'd cap my monthly spend at $50 USD if I were to consider a recurring service, but honestly, I'd prefer a pay-as-you-go model for specific project needs.

Simulated interest: 70/100

Baldwin Kaczmarczykneutral

This service offers vendor lists, which I meticulously maintain myself from public records. While the "Premium" pack at $149 for ~300 contacts is interesting, my own database is far more extensive and tailored to my specific needs. I'd consider a "no-brainer" price to be around $20 for a very specific, hard-to-find niche that isn't already in my system, but I stop considering it above $50. I'd expect a comprehensive and verified list of niche manufacturers, not just general subcontractors. For recurring data, the $99/mo "Monthly Refresh" seems high for what I'd need, perhaps $40/mo would be more reasonable. My maximum monthly spend would be $50.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Keep exploring.

Find your next question or see which topics divide AI panels.

Keep exploring

What would you ask next?

Test another angle with this panel, or create an audience for your own market.