Looking at Loach (https://www.loach.app/): what price would make it a no-brainer for you, and at what price would you stop considering it? What would you expect to get for that money? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Hugh Hand-Larkinpositive

The idea of breaking down quarterly OKRs into actionable weekly tasks is precisely what we're wrestling with. The stated €2.99/user/month is certainly appealing, especially with the first 5 users free. For our team of 8, that's €14.95 per month, which converts to roughly $16.50 USD. That price point is very attractive for a tool promising to solve our planning execution gap. I'd consider it a no-brainer at this price. Anything significantly over $20-$25 USD per month for our team would start to make me reconsider the investment, especially as we're still lean.

Simulated interest: 85/100

Theresa Kuhnpositive

The promise of turning our quarterly OKRs into actionable weekly plans without manual spreadsheet work is incredibly compelling. Given our team of 14, the free tier for 5 users is a starting point, but the "Grow" tier at €2.99/user/month would apply to us. If it truly streamlines the decomposition and alignment process, and especially if it integrates well with Jira to reduce my 15 hours of manual sync time, a no-brainer price would be around $5 per user per month. Anything above $8 per user per month would start to make me reconsider the value proposition and explore alternatives more deeply.

Simulated interest: 85/100

Pete Kutchpositive

From an operational perspective, the idea of turning quarterly OKRs into actionable weekly plans is appealing. We currently use a mix of spreadsheets and shared docs, and it takes a fair bit of manual effort to keep everything visible. If Loach could genuinely streamline that process and provide better real-time visibility for our 22-person team, it could be very valuable. For it to be a no-brainer, I'd expect it to integrate well with our existing workflows and clearly show how our daily tasks contribute to larger goals. The pricing of €2.99/user/month seems reasonable, especially since the first 5 users are free. For our team of 22, that would come to around €50 per month, which is manageable. I'd be willing to pay up to $75 per month for a tool that demonstrably improves our planning and execution, especially if it reduces manual reporting time. However, if the cost crept up significantly beyond that, or if it felt like just another tool to manage rather than a true solution, I'd have to reconsider.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Sterre van der Meerpositive

The concept of breaking down quarterly OKRs into weekly action points is appealing, especially given how client demands can derail our long-term plans. The idea of having a tool that helps translate abstract goals into concrete weekly tasks without adding too much overhead sounds very useful. For our five-person agency, the free tier is a great starting point. If we were to grow beyond that, a price around $15-$20 per month for the team would be a no-brainer. Anything above $50 per month would make me reconsider the value proposition, given our current budget. I'd expect streamlined planning and clear visibility on how our weekly work directly contributes to our quarterly objectives.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Bennie Pacochaneutral

The concept of turning quarterly OKRs into weekly action plans is compelling, especially given my team's struggle with translating high-level goals into daily execution. The free tier for up to 5 users is a good starting point. If it proves effective, I'd consider paying around $50 per month for our team of 12, though the advertised €2.99/user/month for users beyond the initial five seems reasonable. I'd expect robust planning features and clear visibility into how weekly tasks contribute to our quarterly objectives, without adding significant ceremony.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Dolores Wuckertpositive

The pricing model of €2.99 per user per month sounds reasonable, especially with the first five users being free. If it genuinely reduces the manual reconciliation I do in spreadsheets and helps managers with their weekly follow-through, that would be fantastic. A price point of around £3-4 per user per month would feel like a no-brainer for me. Anything significantly over £10 per user per month would make me pause and reconsider the value, given my current budget constraints and reliance on more basic tools. I would expect to see a clear, intuitive interface that simplifies the breakdown of quarterly goals into actionable weekly tasks and provides some level of automated reporting to leadership. My maximum acceptable price would be $50 per month.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Navin Jangidpositive

The free tier for up to 5 users is a great starting point, especially since my business is small and I'm very mindful of software costs. If it truly helps us break down quarterly goals into weekly actions without adding too much overhead, then the €2.99 per user per month after the first 5 would be a no-brainer. I'd expect to see clear progress tracking and better team alignment. For a team of our size, I could see myself paying up to $30 per month, but anything significantly more would make me pause.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Armance Huetpositive

For a tool like Loach that promises to bridge the gap between quarterly OKRs and weekly execution, I'd be interested if it were around $3-4 per user per month. A no-brainer price would be closer to $2.99 per user per month, especially if it truly simplifies our planning and tracking, which is currently a manual effort. I'd expect clear visualization of how weekly tasks contribute to quarterly goals, seamless integration with our existing workflow, and robust support. Anything significantly above $5 per user would likely lead me to reconsider.

Simulated interest: 75/100

Phil Boganpositive

The offer of €2.99 per user per month sounds reasonable, especially since the first 5 users are free. For a 26-person company, that would come out to about €62.70 per month, which is roughly $68 USD. That price would make it a no-brainer for us, given our current reliance on spreadsheets and the need for better alignment between quarterly targets and weekly execution. I'd stop considering it if the price jumped significantly beyond that, perhaps over $150 USD per month. For that cost, I'd expect robust features that truly integrate with our ClickUp workflow and provide real-time visibility into OKR progress, saving us considerable manual reconciliation time.

Simulated interest: 85/100

Vincent Wardneutral

This Loach tool sounds pretty interesting, especially the way it bridges the gap between quarterly OKRs and weekly action items. For a team of our size, the free tier for up to 5 users is definitely a no-brainer to start with. If it proves to be as effective as it claims in streamlining our planning and execution, I could see us investing in the Grow plan. A price of around $5-$7 per user per month would feel about right for the value it promises in terms of team alignment and hitting our goals. Anything significantly above that, maybe pushing $10 per user, and I'd start questioning the ROI compared to refining our current Notion and spreadsheet setup.

Simulated interest: 60/100