What do you use today instead of HakkoAI (https://hakko.ai) (a competitor, a spreadsheet, doing it by hand)? Compared with that, what would make HakkoAI better or worse for you, and what would keep you on your current option? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

10 fictional AI personas. Exploratory perspectives, not a survey of real customers. Methodology & limitations
Simulated interest
AI synthesis, not measured demand
Suggested price range
Median $5 · simulated willingness to pay
Response sentiment
What this panel suggests
Prospects are mostly using free, fragmented workflows instead of HakkoAI: shared spreadsheets, YouTube research, community wikis/forums, and handwritten notes. Compared with those options, HakkoAI looks most compelling when it can truly remove the need to alt-tab and provide timely, game-aware help through screen recognition and voice guidance. The main upside is convenience and speed: users imagine faster decisions during fights, clearer quest/item explanations, and less time spent searching for guides. The main reasons to stay with current tools are that they are free, familiar, and already “good enough” for many players. Skepticism is focused on whether HakkoAI is accurate enough to be worth paying for, and whether it could become a distraction or interfere with competitive play or the user’s setup. On pricing, the panel’s willingness-to-pay is modest, clustering around a $5/month median with some room up to $10/month, so any paid offer likely needs a clear, demonstrable edge over existing free resources.
Pricing & positioning
A low-friction subscription with a free trial or freemium tier is the best fit for this audience, because current alternatives are often free and familiar. Position paid plans around proven in-game time savings, accuracy, and low distraction rather than generic AI novelty.
The supplied willingness-to-pay data centers around $5/month, with a higher-end ceiling near $10/month. That suggests pricing should be conservative at launch and clearly tied to concrete gameplay value.
Recurring themes
“my squad and I rely on a shared Google Sheet and a lot of YouTube research to optimize our Valorant and CS2 gameplay.”Read Laurence Goyette’s response →
“save us a ton of time compared to alt-tabbing for guides between rounds.”Read Laurence Goyette’s response →
“I'd need to see concrete evidence that it provides an advantage rather than a distraction.”Read Laurence Goyette’s response →
Objections to investigate
- Cost vs. Free Alternatives
- Integration and Performance Interference
- Uncertainty of Tactical Value
Use these findings to plan customer interviews or experiments. How to interpret AI research
What the panel said
Click a name to open that persona’s full profile.
Laurence GoyetteneutralRight now, my squad and I rely on a shared Google Sheet and a lot of YouTube research to optimize our Valorant and CS2 gameplay. We manually track agent stats, map strategies, and aim settings. HakkoAI sounds interesting, especially the real-time scene recognition and knowledge search – that could potentially save us a ton of time compared to alt-tabbing for guides between rounds. However, I'm concerned about how well it integrates with competitive FPS games and if it might interfere with my setup. I'd need to see concrete evidence that it provides an advantage rather than a distraction. I'd pay up to $10 per month for a subscription if it proves its worth.
Simulated interest: 50/100
Carole LowenegativeCurrently, my partner and I rely on free community wikis and forums for game walkthroughs. If HakkoAI could offer truly real-time, in-game advice that goes beyond what a static guide provides, that would be a significant improvement. However, my primary hesitation is the cost. Given my focus on financial prudence and saving for a mortgage, I'd need to see substantial value to justify a subscription. I'm comfortable using free resources as they've always served me well, and I'd be reluctant to pay for something when free alternatives exist, especially without knowing the exact pricing structure for a monthly subscription. I'm not willing to pay for this service.
Simulated interest: 10/100
Jim FreyneutralRight now, I use a competitor overlay for builds and match history, and I manually review my replays and stats afterward. If HakkoAI could offer genuinely real-time, actionable advice beyond just basic stats, especially for complex macro decisions in League, that would be an improvement. However, the current overlay is free and integrated, so HakkoAI would need to demonstrate significant value to justify a cost. I'd be willing to pay up to $5 per month for something that measurably improves my climb to Diamond, but I'm skeptical about how much actual in-game tactical advice it can provide.
Simulated interest: 30/100
Jacqueline RemyneutralCurrently, for tracking quests and builds in my games, I rely on a system of handwritten notes and browser bookmarks. It's a tangible method that works for me. HakkoAI sounds interesting, especially the real-time voice chat and scene recognition, which could potentially streamline the process of finding specific information. However, I'm hesitant about integrating another layer of software into my gaming. My current method is free and requires no setup or updates, which is a significant advantage. The main concern would be how seamlessly HakkoAI integrates and if it truly offers a substantial improvement over my established, albeit manual, system. I would need to see evidence that it doesn't disrupt the immersive experience of gaming. Regarding price, I would be willing to pay up to $5 per month, provided it significantly enhances my gaming experience without becoming intrusive.
Simulated interest: 40/100
Bharat BhatneutralRight now, my squad and I use a shared spreadsheet to track agent picks, patch notes, and sensitivity settings for Valorant and Apex. It works because we all contribute and it's free. HakkoAI sounds cool, especially the real-time advice during gameplay, which could be useful for those clutch moments or figuring out new metas. But, I'm not sure if it can replace our collaborative spreadsheet, which we've built up over time. Plus, I'd need to see how it handles the specific data we track. I'm hesitant to pay for another subscription, especially since I just got a new monitor. If it were super accurate and helped us win more consistently, maybe $5 per month would be the absolute max I'd consider.
Simulated interest: 30/100
Becky FayneutralRight now, I'm using my notes app and just manually keeping track of settings and keybinds for Apex Legends and Fortnite. It's a bit cumbersome, but it's free. HakkoAI sounds interesting because it could potentially offer real-time tips and advice during gameplay, which would be way more efficient than pausing to check my notes. That would be a huge improvement. However, I'm not sure how well it integrates with my setup or if it would interfere with my game performance. The biggest thing holding me back from switching would be if it's complicated to use or if it doesn't actually provide accurate or useful advice tailored to my playstyle. I wouldn't pay more than $10 per month for this.
Simulated interest: 30/100
Ethan WoltersneutralCurrently, when Liam and I play games like Age of Empires IV, we rely on build guides and wiki pages. It's a bit of a process, stopping to look things up. HakkoAI sounds interesting because it could offer real-time advice without interrupting gameplay, which would be a significant improvement. The idea of an AI companion is novel, but I'm not sure how practical it would be for the specific games we play. I'd need to see how well it recognizes the game screen and provides truly useful, accurate tips rather than generic advice. The 'emotional companionship' aspect seems a bit much for me, honestly. I would be willing to pay around $5 per month, but I'd want to try it out first. It's hard to say without knowing the pricing basis, but if it's a subscription, $5 per month is my maximum.
Simulated interest: 50/100
Delbert KunzeneutralRight now, I'm using a mix of spreadsheets and a coaching overlay for Dota 2. My spreadsheets track hero pools, draft notes, and counter-picks, which is pretty manual. The overlay helps with gameplay analysis. HakkoAI sounds interesting because it claims real-time advice and screen recognition, which could be useful for quick in-game decisions. However, I'm not sure how it would handle complex Dota 2 strategies or draft phases. My current setup is free, and I've built it to fit my specific needs, so it would need to offer a significant advantage to switch. I wouldn't pay more than $5 per month for something like this, given my budget.
Simulated interest: 30/100
Krystyna KaczorneutralCurrently, I rely on free forums, YouTube, and game wikis for assistance with games. I prefer this because it's free and I can find specific information when I need it. The idea of an AI companion like HakkoAI sounds intriguing, especially the "Knowledge Search" feature for accurate answers. However, I'm concerned about how much it costs and if it truly understands complex game mechanics without misinterpreting things. I also prefer to keep my gaming experiences relatively low-friction, so having an AI constantly interacting might be a bit much. I'd need to see how it performs with the puzzle and simulation games I enjoy. I wouldn't pay more than $5 per month for this.
Simulated interest: 30/100
Varalakshmi AgarwalneutralRight now, for Valorant, I mainly rely on my cousin for callouts and my notes app for remembering keybinds and quest reminders. For story games like Baldur's Gate 3, I'd consult online wikis or guides if I get stuck, but I try to figure things out myself first. HakkoAI sounds interesting because it could potentially offer real-time tactical advice for games, which could be useful. However, I'm not sure how well it would integrate with my current duo setup for Valorant, and I worry about it being another distraction. The biggest draw for me would be its ability to help with complex quest lines or suggest build paths in RPGs. I'd need to see pricing details first, but I wouldn't pay more than $5 per month for something like this, and likely less.
Simulated interest: 30/100
Keep exploring.
Find your next question or see which topics divide AI panels.
What would you ask next?
Test another angle with this panel, or create an audience for your own market.