What do you use today instead of Excalibur (https://getexcalibur.dev) (a competitor, a spreadsheet, doing it by hand)? Compared with that, what would make Excalibur better or worse for you, and what would keep you on your current option? Also say the maximum you would pay per month in USD (0 if nothing).

Ramiro Stantonneutral

Right now, I'm primarily managing feature implementation using Cursor for quick edits, and I keep release checklists and plans in Notion. The idea of an AI agent that handles the full product cycle—from discovery to shipping and auditing—is compelling, especially the 'discover what to build' aspect. It could significantly de-risk projects before we invest heavily. The 'time-travel' feature also sounds powerful for debugging. I'd need to see how it integrates with my existing workflows and if it truly reduces the burden of manual QA and documentation. I'm not seeing pricing information readily available for the core product, so I can't estimate a price at this time.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Maxine Carroll-Rohanneutral

Right now, I'm using GitHub Copilot and a lot of shell scripts for automation. I also rely on my terminal and issue tracker for keeping things close. What Excalibur offers, like the full product cycle from discovery to audit, sounds promising, especially the time-traveling aspect. However, I'm wary of anything that abstracts away too much of the control I have locally. The local-first approach is good, but I'd need to see how it integrates with my existing workflows before committing. Given that the core is open-source, I'd be willing to explore it without cost initially. If I were to consider a paid tier, maybe $50 per month, but that's a very rough estimate based on potential time savings.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Asya Willwacherneutral

Currently, I manage my tasks by meticulously handling implementation, testing, and documentation myself, which often involves breaking down complex features into smaller, manageable steps within my local environment. The idea of an AI coding agent like Excalibur that understands the entire product cycle—from discovery to verification and shipping—is intriguing, especially its local-first approach and commitment to privacy. This aligns with my preference for tools that respect data control. However, the concept of "governance for teams" and the mention of "Enterprise" features suggest a potential shift away from local-only operation, which is a concern. I would need to understand how it handles audit trails and compliance within a locked-down environment. If it genuinely operates fully locally and can integrate seamlessly without external dependencies or cloud processing, it could be beneficial. Otherwise, the existing manual process, though time-consuming, offers the control I require. I would consider paying up to $20 per month for a tool that demonstrably keeps all processing and data local and integrates with my existing strict review processes.

Simulated interest: 60/100

Digambara Pillaineutral

Right now, we use spreadsheets and Jira for planning, and free AI tools for code help. Manual verification is something I handle before releases. Excalibur seems interesting because it claims to cover the whole product cycle, not just coding. The idea of automated verification and discovery before building is appealing, especially with our limited resources. However, I'm concerned about how well it integrates with our current workflow and the actual time savings. The pricing isn't very clear on the page for the core features we'd use, so I'd need to understand that better. For now, I'd say I'm not willing to pay for this, so $0 per month.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Neil Murphyneutral

Right now, I'm mostly doing things manually, using free tools, or cobbling together my own scripts. It's a bit of a grind, honestly, especially when I'm working solo without QA. The idea of something that handles the 'whole product cycle' from discovery to shipping sounds interesting, especially if it can take on some of the repetitive verification or documentation tasks. What would make Excalibur better is if it genuinely saved me time without adding a ton of complexity or a steep learning curve. The biggest hurdle would be if it felt like overkill for my typical short-term contracts, or if the setup was too involved. I'd need to see clear value in automating tasks I can already manage, even if manually, before considering a paid solution. Given my freelance income is variable, I'm cautious about ongoing subscriptions. I'd be willing to pay around $30 per month for something that significantly streamlines my workflow, but that's really the ceiling for now.

Simulated interest: 50/100

Kira van Ierselneutral

Currently, my team and I manage code reviews, test plans, and rollout steps manually, with a strong emphasis on governance and auditability. We also use various AI coding assistants, but their output requires careful scrutiny. Excalibur's promise of managing the entire product cycle, from discovery to audit, is compelling. The 'time-travel' feature and immutable event log sound excellent for traceability, which is crucial for our regulatory environment. However, I'm concerned about the level of autonomy and how it integrates with our existing processes. I'd need to see how it handles complex, nuanced code reviews and ensures our strict governance policies are met without introducing unexpected risks. The pricing isn't clear for team usage, so I can't estimate a monthly cost. I would pay $0 per month for the core offering as it is open-source, but would need to understand the enterprise pricing for my team.

Raoul Brunetneutral

Currently, my workflow involves a combination of manual verification and relying on tools like Claude and GitHub Copilot. What Excalibur offers, covering the entire product cycle from discovery to audit, is intriguing. Its emphasis on "Discover what to build" and built-in quality gates could potentially reduce my manual verification overhead and improve alignment with product. However, I'd need to see how it integrates with our existing processes and if it truly streamlines the entire lifecycle without introducing new complexities. The pricing is unclear; I'd need to understand the specifics of the subscription model to determine a monthly cost. For now, I would not pay for it.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Silvia Bergnaumneutral

Currently, I use GitHub Copilot for some coding tasks and keep our release steps meticulously organised in spreadsheets. Doing things by hand is also part of our process, especially for coordination. Excalibur sounds interesting because it claims to handle the whole product cycle, not just code generation. The 'time-travel' and 'discover what to build' features are compelling. However, I'd need to see how it integrates with our existing workflow and if it truly reduces the manual effort in coordinating with QA and the PM. The pricing isn't clear enough for me to determine a monthly cost, but I'd be hesitant to pay much more than $10 per month for a tool like this without a clearer value proposition. I would likely stick with my current tools unless Excalibur demonstrated significant, tangible benefits for our specific needs.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Mangala Dwivedineutral

Right now, we rely on manual checks and some lightweight scripts I've written for releases. For testing, I do basic unit tests and manual verification. Free AI chat helps with code suggestions. Excalibur seems to cover the whole product cycle, which is interesting, especially the 'discover what to build' and 'verify' parts. That's much more than I have. However, the pricing isn't clear from what I see – is it per user, per project? I'd need to understand the pricing structure to even consider it, but for now, sticking with what works and is free makes sense for our startup. I wouldn't pay anything right now.

Simulated interest: 30/100

Harald Balcerzakneutral

Currently, I rely on a combination of manual coding, our internal repository documentation, and custom shell scripts to manage my workflow. I've experimented with free tiers of AI coding tools, but I haven't found one that fully integrates into my process without significant manual oversight. Excalibur's promise of covering the entire product cycle—from discovery to audit—is intriguing, especially the local-first, open-source aspect. However, my primary concern is the transparency and reliability of AI-generated code, especially for critical paths. While I appreciate the idea of time-traveling work and artifact immutability, I'd need to see concrete evidence of its accuracy and safety before fully committing. My current manual approach, though time-consuming, offers a level of control and predictability I'm hesitant to give up. If Excalibur could demonstrably reduce the manual verification burden without introducing unforeseen risks, it would be compelling. I would consider paying up to $20 per month, on a monthly basis, but only after extensive personal testing.

Simulated interest: 40/100